Trump administration appeals halt of travel ban
The "revised" travel ban is nothing more than an attempt to get around the racist and xenophobic policies this administration has championed. With the 2nd version put on hold by courts in Hawaii and Maryland, the administration has vowed to appeal. They filed an appeal in the Maryland case to the likely-more-friendly 5th circuit court in Richmond.
We must take a stand now to protect the advances we have made in California. Let's set a precident as a "Sanctuary State" and stand up for our values in the face of racism and xenophobia.
Be Part of the Resistance
Join the Movement to Defend California Values
Join the resistance as Californian's stand together to push back against the racist, xenophobic policies coming out of Washington. Join with faith voices, impacted communities and others as we take a stand with our undocumented neighbors and immigrant communities. Help pass the California Values Act!Take Action
The Trump administration filed a notice in a Maryland federal district court on Friday that it would appeal the court's decision halting the president's revised travel ban.
The case, in which the judge on Thursday ruled against President Donald Trump's effort to stop immigration for 90 days from six majority-Muslim countries, heads to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va. The administration is asking the appeals court to reverse the lower court's decision.
The Maryland case, which was brought on behalf of immigrants and nonprofit groups that work with refugees, followed a Hawaii federal court's broader order against the travel ban on Wednesday. That order stopped its pause on immigration from the six nations and its 120-day moratorium on refugee resettlement.
The travel ban was supposed to take effect at 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on Thursday.
Both courts found Trump's travel rules to run afoul of the Constitution by discriminating against Muslims. The courts pointed to Trump's statements promising to suspend Muslim immigration and interviews with campaign and White House officials to make their cases.
"President Trump's Muslim ban has fared miserably in the courts, and for good reason _ it violates fundamental provisions of our Constitution. We look forward to defending this careful and well-reasoned decision in the appeals court," Omar Jadwat of the American Civil Liberties Union, who argued against the travel ban in the Maryland court, said in a statement Friday.
Trump has vowed to take the travel ban to the Supreme Court and has said it falls within his rights as president to control immigration and protect the country from terrorism.
Speaking at a Nashville, Tenn., rally this week, Trump called the revised travel order a "watered down" version of a Jan. 27 executive order that was halted by a Seattle federal judge. That judge's decision was upheld by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The first travel ban stopped refugee resettlement from all countries for 120 days _ and from Syria indefinitely _ and banned citizens of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the U.S. for 90 days while the government was to review its vetting procedures.
The new order attempted to address court concerns by removing a preference for refugees who are religious minorities and giving exemptions from the travel order to green-card holders and those who already have valid visas. It also removed Iraq from the list of countries whose citizens could not come to the U.S.
(c)2017 Los Angeles Times
Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.